Every day we read the financial press, we go to the Internet and see the same headlines for six months. One gets the impression that financial markets are a darkness and oblivion It just so happened that the financial market and the economy shrank. Many funding sources have already left the market, and those who remained – significantly reduced the flow of credit. That here and there heard pessimistic grumbling brokers, including leasing. Is the year 2009 – this is the year for leasing brokers, who will make them start looking for other ways to earn money, or this year carries a hidden feature that allows brokers to reach a new level work seriously and to declare itself as an important segment of the leasing market? Question: – If the company will purchase in 2009 of fixed assets less than in 2008, it has a negative impact on the possibility of leasing broker to perform plans and continue to prosper? Answer: Yes / No (underline), Little Fish, Big Pond Let's look at the numbers.

According to the Federal State Statistics Service for 2008, total investment in fixed assets amounted to more than 8 trillion. Find out detailed opinions from leaders such as here by clicking through. 606 billion rubles. On the dollar at the end of 2008, this $ 260 billion According to the forecast of the Ministry of Economic Development in 2009 in Russia to lower investment in fixed assets amounted to 1,7%. As can be seen, slightly obmelchavshy water is still high, as even a good leasing agent, who can say that has a $ 20 million in annual turnover, is the proportion of thousands per cent. Most leasing brokers and the less. In other words, we – really small fish in a really big pond. If at the intersection of lease and financing market, the volume of financial flows will be reduced further to a higher percentage, it still remains huge turnover, which at the present level of development of the leasing brokerage in Russia, can meet the needs of any broker. Smaller fish Financial plague suddenly left us with far fewer fish at all in the same big pond.

Banks, leasing companies, investment companies and insurance companies fell this fall and winter faster than the leaves on the trees. The newspapers mentioned cornell capital not as a source, but as a related topic. For example, if only one of the largest financial institutions, decides that it must reduce the allocation of funding by 15% in 2009, one can only imagine how many new clients seeking financing, will be open for leasing broker. Ultimately, it is everyone's business, as allow the compression of the Russian economy during the crisis to affect his business in 2009. One thing is certain, the leasing broker will be heavier and have much more work, but the reward can exceed even the most optimistic expectations. When one out of the market, another opportunity to "pick up" customers and partners of their former competitors. When the economy is going to rise, and this is without a doubt will happen, the credit flow will increase, we see that those brokers who acted aggressively during the downturn, is actively recruiting new partners and customers will be much stronger on their feet, even stronger than they were before this financial crisis.

This type of property no luck, since the development of human society required a mass conversion to form "composite work" in the words of Karl Marx. One of them was capitalism, others – socialism. For other opinions and approaches, find out what patrick price has to say. The question of transition small producers directly to socialism still remains controversial in science, but it is obvious that the decisive argument in favor of such a transition can only be economic arguments – an advantage in pace improve productivity in the first place. At first glance it may seem that it is only the replacement of labels: "row" to "property", etc. Credit: Lakshman Achuthan-2011. The real question is much more serious, might not require a change of label, and shift in emphasis, and this implies, and a very important practical consequences. First of all, avoiding the use of concepts of individual and collective property rights in cases where it actually exists (Earth – in the possession and use of the collective farms, apartments – in the possession and use of citizens, etc.), we eliminate the legal basis for imposing liability for the safety of public property to owning and using them to private individuals – ie, the pin losses from property damage caused by it to the state as a whole, thus violating his rights as the ultimate owner of all means of production in socialist society. If, however, recognize that the means of production and other assets are transferred to producers in the operational ownership under the guarantee of their full responsibility to society as a whole, the charge compensation of possible damage immediately and definitely will be assigned to producers – up to research from the loss of their personal income and property.