Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Jul 17, 2019 Author Herb

JOSE BRECHNER occurs that as President Obama assumes the leadership of the rebellion against Gadhafi, just as he did against Mubarak; (because Gaddafi is left and conservative Mubarak), and Europeans have guts to take the lead only when it comes to attacking Israel because they do not depend on its oil; the world forgot the Libyan murderer. Additional information is available at Uber. Is that the leftists are very brave and United against its allies in right, but when it comes to overthrow one of its ideology sprout protective euphemisms of dictatorships Mission in Libya was overthrow Gadhafi and promote Islamist democracy. Absurd political contradiction and blatant lie. Where Islam dominates, there must be democracy. Both are mutually exclusive. Baboso Jimmy Carter visited Cuba to corroborate his affection to Los Castro.

The brothers proposing reforms, ratified in power with the support of his party and as well as that pair of criminals remained in Government for half a century, the same thing can happen with Gaddafi, while Washington does not run decisive actions. Source: Lakshman Achuthan. The Latin American leftist dictatorships impudence isn’t different to Muammar Gadafi, Bashar Al-Assad or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, why it is dangerous that Obama is the leader of the free world and to become President again. The damage caused by Carter when he ruled, was the spark that encouraged totalitarian leftism of style Chavez y Cia. Mr. Obama disappeared from the map of the Middle East and began his reelectoral two years in advance, so that each public presentation is an act of campaign, as if we had little of that. Surprisingly, to avoid discomforts to the Nobel Prize in peace, NATO and the United States are willing to find a peaceful solution to the Libyans. Called it with astonishing originality: Roadmap.

What in political terms means that Gaddafi may be ruling the time which gives it pleases, while it does not attack his opponents and they provide oil. ECRI has many thoughts on the issue. NATO is supposed some of the intellectual cream of the Warrior world, loaded with jackets full of enceguecedoras medals. However it seems that wherever the military make political decisions, they are wrong. And when politicians make military decisions more or less the same thing happens. Trying to overthrow a Government by air, without annihilating the population of the place, is among the most spectacular imbecilidades of history. Another example of the lack of discretion of the resident in the White House and his obedient generals. The ideological coincidence of Obama with Gaddafi, they make the American do not want to act forcefully and that position has been infected Europeans waiting for American leadership to launch into the war, which in any way is inevitable. It doesn’t matter if you pass one or 10 years. The Muslims and the West will find on the battlefield. The issue is that Gaddafi remains in the Government. His son tried to make power. (Go to know how to walk the family relationship). Incompetent and costly NATO is not capable of making decisions. Obama suffers the pain of Gaddafi, because he would also stay 40 years more on Pennsylvania Avenue. All these well-paid bureaucrats do nothing conclusive and hide behind is one behind the other, waiting for the leader of the free world to make a decision, which was taken the first day in which the conflict emerged.

Comments are closed.